HB 2700, Wildfire Relief Fund Corporation, was heard Feb. 2 in a joint committee hearing of the House Committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce and House Committee on Water and Land. NAMIC submitted written testimony opposing the bill. The legislation passed out of committee with the expressed understanding that interested stakeholders would continue discussions with the bill sponsor and proponents about amendments to address concerns raised at the hearing.

It would create a wildfire relief fund that homeowners have to opt out of and insurers would have to opt in to that would limit their damages recovery for a wildfire claim. The legislation would effectuate a waiver of the civil liability claim against an at-fault utility that may have caused the property damages. The at-fault utility would be limited to having to contribute a damages assessment to the fund that would then be paid out to consumers and insurers in an amount determined by the fund.

In its testimony, NAMIC opposed the legislation because:

  • It is likely to create consumer confusion that could adversely impact a consumer’s ability to protect their legal rights;
  • It would provide utilities with a mechanism to reduce their legal liability exposure without requiring them to engage in any proactive, pro-consumer protection wildfire risk mitigation management; and
  • It would create an unworkable legal relationship for homeowners’ insurance companies.
Post Details

Publish Date

February 6, 2024

News Type

  • State of the States

Topics

  • Hawaii

Points of Contact
Christian Rataj
Christian Rataj
Senior Regional Vice President, Western Region