For the insurance industry the use of data, including the use of large sets of data that may be referred to as “Big Data,” is nothing new. Insurance is a data-driven enterprise. It always has been and it always will be as companies use large quantities of data in innovative ways to improve products and services for the benefit of consumers.
Keeping in mind that increased use of data is tied to insurers competing for business, the potential benefits include lower costs as increased use of data makes systems more efficient, and higher customer satisfaction as insurers use data to improve processes and match outcomes with consumer expectations. Increased use of data in underwriting can help insurers identify risk factors within a larger group that may allow the insurer to offer coverage to certain risks at a lower price than if the data were not available. Use of data to identify fraud can help keep overall insurance costs down.
NAMIC has stressed the benefits of insurers’ use of new data and use of traditional data in new ways and has favored exploration of the issues that have emerged, including potential issues for concern, while cautioning against making assumptions regarding potential negative consequences. NAMIC acknowledges there could be concerns about quality of data or misuse of data, but insurers operating in a competitive environment are generally incentivized to avoid such issues in their use of data. Additionally, any concerns that may arise in this area can be addressed under the existing market regulatory structure by applying time-tested principles and standards to new practices.
The NAIC established a Big Data Working Group in 2016 to explore policy implications of insurers’ expanding use of data. Originally working under the auspices of the NAIC’s Market Regulation and Consumer Affairs (D) Committee, in 2017 the Working Group was placed under the newly created Innovation and Technology (EX) Task Force.
April 16, 2020 NAMIC previously reported that the Privacy Protections (D) Working Group had not met outside of regulatory-only meetings since mid-February, nor had it distributed any new materials to the public. On April 15... Read more
March 30, 2020 On its first call of the year held in mid-February, the Privacy Protections (D) Working Group indicated that it would be going into regulator-only mode for a while and would prepare a key issues document that would be circulated for the Spring National... Read more
March 30, 2020 The NAIC Innovation and Technology (EX) Task Force was expected to further explore anti-rebating modernization and amendments to the NAIC Model Unfair Trade Practices Act at the spring meeting in Phoenix. After the meeting was cancelled due to COVID-19... Read more
March 30, 2020 The last meeting of the NAIC Big Data Working Group in Austin in 2019 revealed the continuing work of the group and attempts to ascertain where it may all be leading. Due to COVID-19, attempts to meet in Phoenix and via teleconferencing have been... Read more
February 18, 2020 The House Financial Services Committee’s Task Force on Artificial Intelligence held a hearing Feb. 12 titled “Equitable Algorithms: Examining Ways to Reduce AI Bias in Financial Services.” Lawmakers at the hearing heard from five witnesses... Read more