Print Print | Email Facebook Twitter Share ThisShareThis

Disparate Impact Theory [F/S]

Our Position

NAMIC opposes all efforts by policymakers at both the state and federal to impose the disparate impact standard onto the provision of homeowners insurance. Doing so could undermine the risk-based underwriting process, while triggering a wave of frivolous litigation, and would also violate the jurisdiction of the states to regulate insurance under the McCarran-Ferguson Act.

NAMIC Federal Advocacy on Disparate Impact Theory

National
DisparateImpact
false
true
3
/Home/ArticlesByFilter?region=national&keyIssue=DisparateImpact
~/Home/ReadArticle/
false

NAMIC State Advocacy on Disparate Impact Theory

All
DisparateImpact
false
true
3
/Home/ArticlesByFilter?region=all&keyIssue=DisparateImpact
~/Home/ReadArticle/
false

Posted: Thursday, July 05, 2012 1:44:56 PM. Modified: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 4:39:00 PM.

317.875.5250 - Indianapolis  |  202.628.1558 - Washington, D.C.

NAMIC | Where the future of insurance has its voice TM