Print Print | Email Facebook Twitter Share ThisShareThis

Still Have Questions? Contact Us

Matt Brady

Matt Brady
Public Affairs Director
Federal Affairs

Telephone: 202.580.6742
mbrady@namic.org

Lisa Floreancig

Lisa Floreancig
Public Affairs Director
State Affairs

Telephone: 317.876.4246
lfloreancig@namic.org

Mutual Insurance Group Cites Loophole In Opposing Illinois Workers’ Comp Proposal

The largest property/casualty insurance trade association in the country is on record opposing a legislative proposal in Illinois that would create tort liability for most, if not all, safety service organizations that collaborate with employers, insurers, and brokers to create safer workplaces. The National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies says a loophole in Senate Bill 3287 renders the apparent retention of exclusivity for certain service organizations meaningless.

Mark Johnston, NAMIC’s state affairs director for the Midwest, says the bill undermines the core principle that the workers’ compensation system is the exclusive remedy for on-the-job injuries. “Existing state law clearly states that a service organization retained by the employer, his insurer, or his broker to provide safety service, advice, or recommendations has immunity similar to that available to an employer, insurer, or broker for employee injuries covered by the Workers’ Compensation Act. If SB 3287 becomes law, it would restrict that immunity to only an organization that is wholly owned by the employer, insurer, or broker,” Johnston says.

The loss of immunity only applies to third-party organizations retained by the entity and not service organizations that are part of the entity. ”You’ll see that the elimination of immunity extends to all service organizations affiliated with an entity in any way except through 100 percent downstream ownership,” Johnston explains.

If an entity and the service organization are separate subsidiaries of a common upstream parent, there is no immunity as the service organization is wholly owned by a different, albeit affiliated, firm. This would also be the case when the service organization and insuring function are part of the same corporate person, as neither owns the other.

“Even if this loophole were to be closed, the bill would still be objectionable because it would treat small companies more harshly than larger firms. We believe that the bill, by chipping away at workers’ compensation fundamentals, is bad public policy and should be rejected,” Johnston says.

The House Judiciary Committee will conduct a hearing on the legislation proposal May 7.

NAMIC has 1,400 mutual insurance member companies serving more than 135 million auto, home, and business policyholders and writing in excess of $196 billion in annual premiums.

Lisa Floreancig
Public Affairs Director, State & Policy Affairs
lfloreancig@namic.org
317.876.5250

Posted: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 3:47:59 PM.

317.875.5250 - Indianapolis  |  202.628.1558 - Washington, D.C.

NAMIC | Where the future of insurance has its voice TM