|
|
STATE |
STATUTORY CITATION |
PROVISIONS |
Colorado |
Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-17-301 to 13-17-304 |
The law discourages the use of contingent fee relationships between attorneys and the government. If the government engages a contingent fee attorney, the following conditions are to be followed by the private attorney. |
Connecticut |
2005 Conn. Pub. Act. 3 |
Requires proposals or requests for qualification and negotiation procedures for any contract between the Attorney General or state agency and private attorneys in which the contingency fee is reasonably expected to exceed $250,000. Specified that the Attorney General is to develop such procedures and qualifications. |
Kansas |
Kan. Stat. Ann. § 75-37,135 |
Prior to entering a contract for legal services where the amount of the fees paid to an attorney or firm of attorneys reasonably may exceed $ 1,000,000, the director of purchases shall submit the proposed request for proposal to the legislative budget committee. |
Minnesota |
Minn. Stat. § 8.065 |
Specifies that the attorney general may not enter into a contract for legal services in which the fees and expenses paid by the state, or can reasonably be expected to exceed $1 million unless the attorney general first submits the proposed contract to the Legislative Advisory Commission, and waits at least 20 days to receive a possible recommendation from the commission. |
North Dakota |
N.D. Cent. Code § 54-12-08.1 |
The attorney general may not appoint or allow to be employed a special assistant attorney general in a civil case in which the amount in controversy exceeds one hundred fifty thousand dollars and the special assistant attorney general is compensated by a contingent fee arrangement, unless the contingent fee arrangement is approved by the emergency commission. A state governmental entity may not contract for legal services that are compensated by a contingent fee arrangement, unless the entity receives an appointment from the attorney general for a special assistant attorney general for each case in which there is a contingent fee arrangement. |
Texas |
Tex. Govt. Code § 2254.103 |
A state governmental entity may enter into a contingent fee contract for legal services only if: (1) the governing body of the state governmental entity approves the contract and the approved contract is signed by the presiding officer of the governing body; or (2) for an entity that is not governed by a multimember governing body, the elected or appointed officer who governs the entity approves and signs the contract. |
Virginia |
Va. Code Ann. § 2.2-510.1 |
No state agency or state agent shall enter into a contingency fee contract for legal services in which contingency fees and expenses are reasonably anticipated to exceed $ 100,000 until an open and competitive negotiation process has been undertaken in accordance with the provisions of the Public Procurement Act (§ 2.2-4300 et seq.), applied mutatis mutandis. The contract shall be awarded to the attorney or firm that submits the most competitive proposal to provide such services considering the cost of the services, the qualifications of the attorney or firm to provide the services, the experience of the attorney or firm with similar legal matters, legal expertise generally, and such other relevant factors as may be identified by the Attorney General. |
Legislative and Regulatory Information Service (LARIS)
NAMIC Survey of New State Insurance Laws