|
|
THE ISSUE IS. The enactment of medical malpractice liability reform legislation.
IT'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE. The cost of medical malpractice insurance, which serves to insure doctors and others in the medical field for liability claims arising from patient treatment, has skyrocketed in the past few years. These rate increases have resulted from a number of factors, including: the growing number of medical malpractice claims, rising defense costs, and a reduced supply of available coverage. For example, the average jury award in medical malpractice lawsuits has more than tripled to $3.5 million since 1994.
Due to these rising costs, there are nationwide examples of doctors refusing to take on new patients, having to quit their practices, or relocating to other states. Additionally, many insurance companies that once provided medical malpractice coverage have been forced to completely withdraw from the market, while others have had to stop selling such policies.
NAMIC POSITION. NAMIC believes that Congress must pass legislation to reform medical malpractice liability. While those who are truly harmed by medical malpractice should be justly compensated for their injuries, the current system is forcing many doctors quit their practices or relocate because the rising costs are simply too much. If this trend continues, more and more doctors will be unable to practice, and as a result, more patients will have difficulty finding proper care. NAMIC is supportive of medical malpractice legislation that would limit the runaway jury awards of non-economic and punitive damages.
As a "minuteman," you will be in the know at the critical moment when a call to action is necessary or when decisions are being made on issues like federal regulation of insurance, legal reform, terrorism insurance, asbestos reform and small property/casualty company taxation.
Every two years, NAMIC presents their coveted Benjamin Franklin Public Policy Award© to lawmakers who have supported a stronger insurance market at least 75 percent of the time. This is demonstrated based on their support of NAMIC's position on certain roll call votes taken, or being a principal player/sponsor on legislation affected the property/casualty insurance industry, during the previous Congress.