read Read

e-mail E-mailprint Print

New Jersey: Preponderance of Evidence Sufficient to Prove Fraud Under Statute, Supreme Court Rules

The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that a preponderance of the evidence, as opposed to clear and convincing evidence, is sufficient to prove a case of civil fraud under the state's Insurance Fraud Protection Act.


For free access to this article, you must be a registered user of NAMIC Online from a NAMIC-member company.

Not a registered user of NAMIC Online. Register today, it's free.

Get access to complete news article archives, and have access to other special reports. Learn about the benefits of becoming a registered user.

Register Today
 

Login

Username:   

Password:   

Auto Login (recommended)

Request a username or password reminder

Help


powered by Google

Latest State News

New Jersey: Committee Approves NAMIC-backed GDL Bills (11/18/2008)

New Jersey: Supreme Court to Consider Case Pitting HO, Auto Liability Coverage (11/4/2008)

West Virginia Leads Nation Again in Frequency of Deer-Vehicle Collisions; Michigan, Pennsylvania, Iowa, Arkansas Round Out Top Five (10/9/2008)

More...

Receive State-specific Updates

Receive e-mail updates from NAMIC Online regarding the states of most interest to you. You will only receive an e-mail when new stories are posted, and only for those states you select. No new news...no e-mail.

RSS

Archives 

Publications 

--